List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
Elements describe the essential outcomes. | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. |
1 | Prepare to change advanced or complex die | 1.1 | Determine when changeover will be required, and plan requirements for die change |
| 1.2 | Prepare dies and all equipment related to the advanced or complex die change |
| 1.3 | Prepare the moulding machine for die removal according to enterprise procedures |
|
2 | Change dies | 2.1 | Remove die according to enterprise procedures, in a safe, systematic and time efficient manner |
| 2.2 | Clean and store die according to workplace procedures applying corrosion protection if required. |
| 2.3 | Prepare the moulding machine according to procedures |
| 2.4 | Attach replacement die to the machine according to procedures |
|
3 | Set advanced or complex die | 3.1 | Set machine conditions for new die |
| 3.2 | Restart machine in accordance with procedure |
| 3.3 | Dry cycle machine and die according to enterprise procedures |
| 3.4 | Check operation of die and power and control devices against die set up specifications. |
| 3.5 | Check the first-off sample for compliance with required standards |
| 3.6 | Fine tune settings and other production variables as required |
| 3.7 | Note any equipment variances between actual production and documented set up conditions |
| 3.8 | Complete workplace documentation and report to appropriate personnel |
|
4 | Anticipate die setting problems | 4.1 | Identify potential problems which may occur during the die changing and setting process |
| 4.2 | Determine possible causes of these problems |
| 4.3 | Identify most likely causes and prioritise appropriate actions |
| 4.4 | Rectify problems using appropriate solutions within area of responsibility |
| 4.5 | Recommend improvements in systems or procedures |
Evidence required to demonstrate competence in this unit must be relevant to and satisfy the requirements of the elements and performance criteria and demonstrate the ability to:
read and interpret technical and product specifications, instruments/control panels and data
plan and prepare for die changeover
remove, clean and store die according to procedures
place, attach and adjust die to specifications
make hydraulic, pneumatic and electrical connections as required
set machine conditions for new die
monitor key variables, including:
alignment and fitting to patens
stability during production
fine adjustments of die movements to optimise production
die temperature control
die component stroke
clamping force
speeds
pressure
sequencing
interlocks
machine pressure, sequencing and interlocks
check the installation and operation of new die to identify conformance and/or non-conformance to specifications
make adjustments to settings and equipment operation to rectify variations in equipment operation or product quality
identify hazards and apply relevant hazard controls
distinguish between causes of problems, such as:
operational problems
instrument failure/malfunction
hydraulic failure/malfunction
pneumatic failure/malfunction
electrical failure/malfunction
mechanical failure/malfunction
wrong readings
wrong dies
wrongly set die
worn or damaged die
non-optimum process conditions
incorrect material type or poor quality
equipment design deficiencies
resolve non-routine problems
communicate effectively with team/work group and supervisors
complete workplace records.
Must provide evidence that demonstrates knowledge relevant to their job sufficient to fulfil their job role, including knowledge of:
types and features of advanced/complex dies, including
sliding blocks or cores actuated by skew pins or cams
baffled, spiral, tube, and heat pipe cooling systems
rising cores
internally actuated unscrewing systems
external power and control sources,
externally actuated sliding blocks, cores and unscrewing systems
safety interlocks
die setting procedures for advanced/complex dies
verification procedures for advanced/complex dies
impact of incorrect or faulty fitting
settings and adjustments of equipment, machine components and ancillary equipment in fine tuning dies
routine and non-routine problems that may arise, the range of possible causes and appropriate actions
organisation procedures relevant to the work environment/job role
hierarchy of control
hazards that may arise in the job/work environment and:
their possible causes
potential consequences
appropriate risk controls.
The unit should be assessed holistically and the judgement of competence shall be based on a holistic assessment of the evidence.
The collection of performance evidence is best done from a report and/or folio of evidence drawn from:
a single project which provides sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria
multiple smaller projects which together provide sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria.
A third-party report, or similar, may be needed to testify to the work done by the individual, particularly when the project has been done as part of a project team.
Assessment should use a real project in an operational workplace. Where this is not possible or where personal safety or environmental damage are limiting factors assessment must occur using a sufficiently rigorous simulated environment that reflects realistic operational workplace conditions. This must cover all aspects of workplace performance, including environment, task skills, task management skills, contingency management skills and job role environment skills.
Assessment in a simulated environment should use evidence collected from demonstration of skills and one or more of:
walk-throughs
pilot plant operation
industry-based case studies/scenarios
‘what ifs’.
Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence or through an independent process, such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews.
Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.
Conditions for assessment must include access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required, including relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications associated with this unit.
The regulatory framework will be reflected in workplace policies and procedures and is not required to be independently assessed.
Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately.
Assessors must satisfy the assessor competency requirements that are in place at the time of the assessment as set by the VET regulator.
In addition the assessor or anyone acting in subject matter expert role in assessment shall demonstrate both technical competency and currency. If the assessor cannot demonstrate technical competency and currency they shall assess with a subject matter expert who does meet these requirements.
Technical competence can be demonstrated through one or more of:
relevant VET or other qualification/Statement of Attainment
appropriate workplace experience undertaking the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
appropriate workplace experience supervising/evaluating the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
Currency can be demonstrated through one or more of:
being currently employed undertaking the type of work being assessed
being employed by the organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed and having maintained currency in accordance with that organisation’s policies and procedures
having consulted/had contact with an organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed within the last twelve months, the consultation/contact being related to assessment
conducting on the job training/assessments of the type of work being assessed
being an active member of a relevant professional body and participating in activities relevant to the assessment of this type of work.